Monday, August 30, 2010

Locations Apps and Student-Athletes: A Recipe for Trouble?

When Facebook recently instituted Places without any input or permission, I was disappointed, but not surprised. Like many of you, I value my privacy, but understand why Facebook does what it does. We are all willing participants.

But when it comes to protecting the privacy of college student-athletes, I have a bigger concern. One of safety and risk. Like many colleges, we have, from time to time, had student-athletes pursued by fanatic fans. Nothing tragic yet, but it's there nonetheless. The bigger the public profile, the more they are at risk.

Tonight I am meeting with the track and field and cross country athletes to talk about social media privacy settings and how to protect yourself. I thought I would share a basic outline here of what I am going to give them.

1. What Facebook Places is and concerns:
-Friends can check you in to places you are not,as a joke
-Friends can check you in to places you are where anyone can find you
-Potential stalkers can find you if you have friended them unknowingly

2. Make sure you have Facebook Places disabled in your privacy settings.
I am going to walk them through this demo.

3. Discussion about Foursquare and the potential hazards for letting anyone and everyone know where you are.
-Foursquare can be more dangerous than Facebook Places because of the Twitter and Facebook interfaces that allow people to see where you are. Make sure, if you use Foursquare, that you don't enable/link to Twitter or Facebook. Once you check-in on Foursquare, anyone on Foursquare can see where you are. There is an "off-the-grid" option you can check so people don't see where you are, but it's not default and needs to be checked everytime. Kind of defeats the purpose of being on Foursquare unless you're just there to see where everybody else is. (Thanks to Cassie Gage for the info on Foursquare.)

4. Discussion about Twitter and protected tweets.
-Student-athletes can protect their tweets which allows them to have only real friends following them.

5. Discussion about not friending media on Facebook and blocking them as followers on Twitter.
-This is a hot potato at a lot of schools, but we are asking our student-athletes to monitor their Twitter followers and block all those that are not their friends. With media, even if they know them, we are asking them not to friend them or let them follow.

Bottom line for us--we don't want to ban our student-athletes from using social media (you really can't anyway), but we want them to be safe and smart as they use it.

What are you guys doing at your schools?

Sunday, August 29, 2010

The Great Tool Discrepancy

While reading an article on Mashable about the new Digg, I noticed an interesting statement. It seems that Austin Kucher only has 4000 followers on Digg compared to the over 5 million he has on Twitter. Is this a surprise?

Digg is making an effort to increase the clout of its SUL (suggested user list) by recruiting big corporates and celebrities to enroll on Digg to attract a bigger audience. But is Digg really the place where people who follow Kucher on Twitter really want to go to see stuff he recommends? If he finds something interesting, doesn't he just tweet it out anyway?

I read Mashable's top ten Twitter trends every week and always feel a little deflated to notice I very rarely, if ever, follow any of the trends. Even though I use Twitter faithfully, it's not to see what Justin Bieber is up to. I don't see Digg turning into another Twitter in that regard.

It seems Digg has evidently failed at doing what it originally set out to do, so now it is reinventing itself to be a more culturally relevant and trendy service. Well, that's okay. I think that pop culture and news can reside together. Look at YouTube and Twitter. I am curious, however, if this is what a service like Digg has to do to compete? After all, we do have AllTop, StumbleUpon,and others  that are cousins to Digg.

So I am wondering how Digg is going to differentiate itself? Tools have different cultures, and some are multicultural. Twitter has many uses and many audiences. It is one of the only places on earth where everyday people like me can actually get a window on Austin Kucher's life, if that's what you want. Twitter is the Entertainment Tonight of the social media world, but it is also developing into a huge news stream for people like me who are on there mining good online articles from people like Liz Strauss, Chris Brogan, Jason Falls, Brian Solis and others. Twitter serves a broad range of people and functions. I am anxious to see what happens to Digg.

Friday, August 27, 2010

The Social Media Tool Box: Beginning Edition

Here's a presentation I am doing for a Social Media Summit Saturday in Bozeman. The summit is for nonprofits, but there's a lot of good info here for everybody. Enjoy and let me know what you think.

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Three Good Reasons for Not Engaging in Social Media

I am often asked by people if they should be on Twitter or Facebook or have a YouTube channel or blog. Since I am not a fan of throwing darts with a blindfold on, I always ask them, "why do you want to do that?" I get such incredible answers that I decided to take the top three and share them.
1. Because Everyone Else Is.
This is by far my favorite answer. Don't get me wrong, I believe strongly in the use of integrated media in the context of a well-thought out marketing plan. But just to jump in the pool because you see everyone else is in there, without knowing how to swim or knowing anything about the water is not smart. Jim Sterne said in his book Social Media Metrics, "You do not want to blunder onto the scene without a clear idea of why you are there and what you want out of it."

Before you consider any social media at all as part of your marketing/promotions plan, you need to ask yourself these questions:

• What is the problem/opportunity we have that social media can solve?

• Do we know what the time commitment is and do we have the time and people to pull it off?

• Do we know where our people/fans are getting their information (or have we engaged in a well-planned listening program)?

• What value will it add to our organization/product?

2. Because It's Free.
There may be a monetary advantage to social media, but isn't your time worth money? Social media takes time, resources, and people to pull off. After you have listened to your fans, devised a plan and found which platforms will add value to your organization, you need to find out exactly how much time your plan will involve. Then, you need to find the people with the extra time to manage it. Then, you need to find the training for the managers. None of these are impossible tasks, but they take time. Do you have the time for thoughtful, effective engagement?

3. Because We Don't Want our Customers/Fans Saying Bad Things About Us.
This one always puzzled me. It's like the question, "If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear it, will it make a noise?" Just because you aren't there, doesn't mean people are talking about you. They are. And you can't control it. And for that matter, you don't want to control it. Social media experts all agree that engaging your critics, not silencing them, is one of the benefits of social media. Becoming a part of the conversation in a constructive, informative way gives you credibility. Going online to delete comments and refute critical information will just get you in trouble. The corporate world is filled with examples over the last couple years--just ask BP, Toyota, or Domino's Pizza. Have a plan for engaging critics online before you start.

What other incredible reasons have you heard for starting a social media campaign?

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Five Basic Bits About bit.ly

I love aggregators. I love metrics. I love aggregators with built-in metrics. I believe that the future of social media is in aggregators with sophisticated metrics—one-stop shopping, if you will.

Miller Littlejohn, in an interview for a Mashable article on the future of social media said,
"Right now, the most important tools are the broadcasting tools … But in five years, the most important tools will be the monitoring and measurement tools — the tools that can tell you what happened to your message once it got out there. [T]he tools that can demonstrate (and quickly demonstrate) return on engagement will be winners.”
When it comes to defining reach, one of the better tools in my toolbox right now is bit.ly, a URL shortener used by Tweet Deck and others. Here are five bits you’ll want to know about bit.ly (Hootsuite has the same services attached to their owl.ly URL shortener, if you are a Hootsuite user).

1. You’ll need a bit.ly account. You have three options (see #5) I’ve signed up for the free pro service because I have a custom domain. The basic free service does not require a custom domain. Just go to http://www.bit.ly/ and sign-up. You’ll need to provide them with your twitter account name.

2.  Use it in all posts where you use a URL. If I am doing a press release with an embedded URL, I get a shortened URL from bit.ly first so I can track the reach of that URL. Same for any online publication.

3. Use the Sidebar Bookmarklet. The bit.ly sidebar bookmarklet shortens URLs on any webpage directly into whatever you are working on. It shows related link traffic, “conversations,” and history. The bookmarklet will track your bit.ly links on Twitter, Gmail(add the gadget), and Facebook as well. I like the conversations section for tracking comments on blog entries that I post using the bit.ly shortener. The number of comments show up on the dashboard in the conversations section attached to that particular URL.

4. Go beyond the basics. Bit.ly has a number of detailed metrics you can use triggered by particular tags on the URL. There is a learning curve but I think the investment of time is worth it to get the deeper metrics from your URLs. See the FAQ page for lots of additional info.

5. Bit.ly has three levels of service, depending on what you want. The basic service is free, the Pro version is for those who have a custom domain and provides more metrics, is also free. The Enterprise solution costs $995/month. The differences between the three can be seen here.

Are you using any URL metrics? If you’re a Hootsuite user, how do the two compare?

Friday, August 13, 2010

9 Things You Need to Know About Mobile Applications

Note: Dr. Bill Smith is a longtime member of the CoSIDA New Media/Tech Committee and frequent national presenter on new media topics. He is currently the Assistant AD for New Media at University of Arkansas Athletics and heads one of the most savvy new media efforts today in college athletics. U of A Athletics recently launched its new mobile application called IHog, designed by Smith. In this guest post, he writes about the nine things you need to know about mobile applications. You can follow him on Twitter @Doctor_BS.

Mobile applications are the most important part of the three-screen strategy for information dissemination. This is not because it is the new web thing to do, nor is it the place where your fan spends the most screen time. Increasingly first screen - television - is homogenized; more networks, less local differences. Second screen -Internet presence- is also dominated by one major network in the college space, much to the detriment of individual look and feel. Third screen - the mobile device - can become the separator, both positive and negative. Good mobile is very hard to do, and nothing ruins the very personal web more than unreliable or under performing apps.

Mobile is personal, both in scale and usage. A fan is seeking a simple interface that brings the information they want about your team to them in a easy to use way. Here are nine things you need to know before getting a mobile app.

1. Use an experienced mobile programmer: As a rule of thumb, contract with no one who cannot show you at least two real-world applications they have successfully launched. The last thing you want to do is pay with your programming dollars for their experience. I didn't pull that out of thin air - that is both experience and listening to the experts. Anyone can write and compile code. Doing it efficiently and within Apple's parameters absolutely requires experience with the process. While building apps is easier in the Android world, efficient coding still requires experience. And, if you are building one app, do not assume your programmer has the skill to just convert it to another platform. Insist on seeing skill in each one you need.

2. To skin or not to skin: A fast and less expensive way to achieve an app, particularly in the iSpace, is to work with a company at can rework the template of existing apps. Almost every radio station app is a "reskin" of one of three major groups. The downside is that fans will compare, and it will not take long for them to realize the "U" has the same app as "State," just different colors.

3. Spend time on the architecture: Think through what you want your fans to reach quickly, and what add-ons allow them to interact with you directly. Is news the primary function? Study the layouts of the major wire services and newspapers (look at the Wall Street Journal's). They get you to the headlines from the opening, and one click to a full story - not a RSS summary.

4. Be social: Even though they may have their own clients, embed social media elements like official Twitter and Facebook pages, and create interactive like the CoverItLive blogs.

5. Beware of cheap apps: Notorious in this area are faux apps that are really nothing more than RSS readers. When you choose a category, you get the headline and the summary that is generated by your website's feed, and no full story or photo. The worst of these will actually open your mobile device's browser and pull up your regular website. If that kind of experience is what you wanted, you would have simply given your fans a bookmark.

6. Custom work costs money: When using outside agencies, be prepared to spend from $5,000 to as much as $20,000 to complete the task. It sounds like a tremendous amount of money, especially compared to the likely cost of your website - free against the advertising revenue taken from you. Like no where else in your media budgeting, you absolutely get what you pay for. "Free" apps tend to crash, lack features that speed the experience and lack customization.

7. Media costs even more: Streaming audio and video do not cost a lot to program into an app - the major platforms have their built in players. But, that is the problem. To stream into the iSpace requires a non-Flash file, very different from what you currently use on-line. Android and Windows are reported to be preparing to support Flash, but the cell networks require a very compressed, and again, separate and specialized file format. If your web provider can't interpret your steams into mobile friendly formats, you will need your own media server and some expertise in the conversions.

8. Know your rights: There is a high likelihood that you have signed away the ability to have your own app, but most Internet providers, when challenged with the specific needs you have, are willing to walk away from the high cost and perceived low return. Worse, they may have a skinned app that is less than useful. Insist on the functionality you require.

9. Go audio, not video: Another rights issue. More and more athletic conferences and regional networks are retaining any of the third screen streaming rights for member and client video. That should prove the value of the mobile space - networks rarely hang on to rights they don't think are important. The one area that institutions remain in control are their audio rights - radio play-by-play. For this reason, we have concentrated on getting our audio into the iSpace. We will not have wasted money on programing that could get turned off in a year or two with expanding rights. Plus, audio streaming takes less bandwidth, less battery and works nicely with the multitasking of the more powerful phones. Listen to the game, and open up another program to participate in interactive blogs - something you cannot do while watching streaming mobile video.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Think Again About Facebook Landing Pages

I know some HTML. Just enough to get frustrated. I also know some PHP--same deal. Our old website used to be done in both and I had to learn enough, or at least learn to copy the right strings, to keep it up. That seems like ages ago.

When it came time to launch a new Facebook page, I really wanted to try my hand at a Facebook landing page. I liked the concept of being able to have something more graphically exciting than the FB wall. When I first Googled "Facebook landing pages", I found 45,500,000 entries. Yikes. There are videos and articles aimed at beginners and experts alike.  Here is a look at five good examples from Mashable.

I looked at some examples from college athletics and the best one I could find at the time was the Wisconsin Badger page. They change this frequently, and right now their tickets tab is the main visual page.

I got inspired, so I decided to tackle the project, kinda. There's that FBML. I had asked around and found out that FBML was pretty similar to HTML but without a lot of the tags and stuff. It's that "tags and stuff" info that bothered me. So, I looked online for information and soon found there was too much info. Then I got saddled with the track guide. And then the annual report. So, I decided to farm it out, literally.

We hired a local web development company here in Bozeman named Future Farm to code the page for us. I just didn't have time to mess with it. I made them all the graphics, designed the page and just asked them to put it together. They didn't charge us much and I really like the way it turned out. This year we are using the "I'm a Bobcat" theme on everything, so I used the FBML application on Facebook to construct and name the tab. That was not very hard.

We are hosting the graphics in a folder on our FTP site with Sidearm. Whenever I want to change a graphic, I just make another one the size to fit one of the holes, upload the graphic to the FTP, find the line of code in the FBML page and re-path the new graphic in the FBML code. Now that I have bought the code, I can re-use it for other tab pages as well. By the way, we branded all the graphics to our web page. It's a little wordy, so I am working on editing the cutlines.

What do you think? Have you got a landing page on your Facebook page? Could you leave the URL in the comments? It would be cool to see what others are doing.

Thursday, August 5, 2010

My 5 Best Social Media Reads This Summer

Summer is almost gone--can you believe it? It is traditionally my reading season as my work is a tad bit slower in the summer. I vowed to use the summer to challenge my thinking on social media, so most of these are thought leadership books. Here we go.

1. Open Leadership by Charlene Li.
If you didn't read Groundswell, start there first. Li and Josh Bernoff wrote Groundswell based on research done by Forrester--a company Li has since left to form the Altimeter Group. This book takes up where Groundswell left off in that it takes all the basics we learned about psychographics, sociographics and demographics of social media and applies it to leadership. This book is about control versus openness. According to Li, openness is not chaos, but precision. This is a great read.

2. Engage by Brian Solis.
Always analytical, always detailed. This book takes you through a progression from Social Media 101 to the deep stuff. I love his diagrams. He is a master communicator and a futurist thinker. He said originally he wanted to call this book "Engage or Die" because he says that is what happens to organizations that refuse to engage their people. High vocab sometimes, but always understandable. I've lent the book out so many times I don't know where it is.

3. Social Media Metrics by Jim Sterne.
In my never ending quest to find the perfect metric, this book is a wealth of information. If you are just getting past the point of using something basic like Facebook Insights or Google Analytics, you will be challenged by this book. He lays the groundwork for helping you understand such intriguing topics as sentiment information extraction and helps you understand why metrics for Twitter are not an exact science. Lots of research in this book if you are looking to quantify.

4. Trust Agents by Chris Brogan and Julien Smith
How can you not like Chris Brogan? He is polarizing and irreverent. Just the kind of person I want to read. But he is also super smart, innovative and successful. He and Julien Smith get out in front of the pack teaching us how to use the web to "build influence, improve reputation and earn trust." My goal is to be an Agent Zero--you gotta read it. It's good stuff

5. A Million Miles in a Thousand Years by Donald Miller
OK--this is not a book about social media but it is hands-down the best book I have read in a long time, much less this summer. Miller helped me remember that it is not the destination that counts, it is the middle. Boy, how I needed to hear that this summer. He takes the reader through a great journey as he tries to find his biological father. You will cry with him and laugh at him.

There are so many great books out there--can you add to the list?

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Who Owns That Social Media Account?

I raised a lot of eyebrows this summer at a national conference when I told the audience that our organization requires all managers of social media accounts that are branded with us to file their logins and passwords with our social media manager. I knew what they were thinking--shades of McCarthyism.

But the truth is, we believe that any account that purports to represent the organization is ultimately the organization's property. What does that mean exactly? Who owns that social media account anyway?

Last spring I was charged with writing the organization's social media policy. So, I hit the internet for research. There were several well-written policies, and I documented those in an earlier blog post. I honed these from several sites I looked at online that were similar to this one. There is a template site out there too, but we wanted a policy that fit our organization's culture, so we went the long route. The template site is a good start, but not a good end unless you don't intend to use the policy and just need one for reference.

After much ado about something, we finally got our policy approved, and it includes the following:
A.Institutional Ownership

Any social/new media account considered a public account (see I-B) representing the interests of Bobcat Athletics is the property of Montana State Athletics. Such sites must be registered with the department's social media manager. Permission to start a public account must be obtained from the department's social media manager.
 
This actually sounds more stiff than the real intent, but our lawyer didn't want us to put in print that we were going to request logins and passwords. The registration process includes the listing of logins and passwords. There was a two-fold purpose in our intent:
  1. To remind everyone that when they post anything online, it ultimately reflects on the whole organization. There is accountability, but we never intend to control what they post. (read our whole policy on link above)
  2. To be able to access any social media account in case of any emergency.
What's your view on ownership of social media accounts?

wibiya widget